9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (9) TMI 1201X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Petitioner. Shri K. Srinivasa Murthy, Sr. Central Govt. Panel Counsel, Alagu Goutham, Govt. Adv. and K. Ravindranath, for the Respondent. ORDER The petitioner has challenged an order in original dated Nil-4-2007 by way of present writ petition which has been filed on 1-6-2017. No explanation is tendered in the affidavit to explain the delay of 10 years in approaching this court and even in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... This explanation satisfies the Court quite apart from the fact that this issue has not even been raised in the writ petition. 4. As regards the other two points raised, they touch upon the merits of the matter which had to have been agitated by the petitioner in appeal or if the petitioner were of the view that this Court should have been approached under Article 226 of the Constitution of I ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r which it may be permitted to seek review under Section 17 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 on resting the so-called error; I find this submission misconceived on merits. The quantification of the penalty is of a sum of Rs. 1.5 Crores (approx). The officer states that this is equivalent to CIF value of Rs......../- (blank in the order). This sought to be highlighted by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
