TMI Blog2023 (10) TMI 73X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and also for impleading him as Respondent in the main petition. It was submitted by Mr. Mukherjee, Ld. Sr. Counsel for appellant that subsequently an intervention application was also filed. Be that as it may, considering the fact that a plea has been taken that without impleading Appellant order has been passed, it is desirable to dispose of this appeal granting liberty to the appellant to file appropriate application before the NCLT. If such application is filed it is expected that Ld. NCLT without any further delay preferably within ten days from the date of filing of such application by the Appellant may pass appropriate order in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties - It goes without saying that Ld. NCLT may not be infl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Ld. Counsel who has appeared on behalf of Respondent No.2. Since, after examining the impugned order we are not intending to go into the merit of the case, we think that without issuance of notice to other Respondents the appeal can be disposed of. The present appeal has been preferred under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013 against an order dated 31.05.223 passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (herein after referred to as NCLT) in I.A. No. 106 of 2023 which was filed in CA No. 97 of 2022 in CP No. 110/Chd/Pb/2020 which was filed on behalf of Respondent No.1 an order has been passed. Since the order seems to appear to be passed with consent of the parties the same is reproduced herein below: ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... impugned order, it is evident that Mr. Bali, Ld. Sr. Counsel who had appeared on behalf of the Appellant had offered for resolving the dispute and thereafter Ld. NCLT was also of the view that all the parties may take steps for resolving the dispute. However, the appellant is aggrieved with the order whereby it is has been directed that regarding transferred shares as on 17.05.2023 no further step shall taken in respect of record of ROC and these shares should not be further alienated. On perusal of the aforesaid order, it is evident that only for the purposes of resolving dispute hearing was deferred and interim order was also passed. However, Mr. Mukherjee, Ld. Sr. Counsel tried to persuade the court that the Appellant though was purch ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
