9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 1662X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Jain, CA. ORDER PER K. NARSIMHA CHARY, J.M. 1. This is an appeal filed by Department against the order of the ld CIT(A)-7, New Delhi, dated 28.02.2017 for the Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. At the outset of the hearing itself, the ld. DR brought to our attention that CBDT vide Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08th August 2019 has decided that the revenue would not prefer any appeal before the Tribunal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows: S.No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (Rs.) 1. Before Appellate Tribunal 50.00,000 2. Before High Court 1.00.00.000 3. Before Supreme Court 2.00,00.000 3. Further, with a view to provide parity in filing of appeals in scenarios where separate order is passed by higher appellate authorities for each assessment year ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ch involves more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year, no appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in para 3. In case where a composite order/ judgement involves more than one assessee. each assessee shall be dealt with separately." 4. The said modifications shall come ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... th August, 2019 . 5. In view of the above, Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 will apply to all pending appeals. Therefore the precedent, it is held that the appeal is not maintainable in the instant case as the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lakhs. Accordingly, it is held that appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable. We also hastened to add that certain times instances stated in para ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
