9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (10) TMI 1055X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -2023 passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment year 2016-17. 2. The grounds of appeal are as under:- "1. The Learned CIT (A) has erred in confirming excess income applied of Rs. 28,25,819/- as unexplained expenditure incurred u/s 69C of the Act. 2. Without prejudice to above, Assessee prays that excess expenditure of Rs. 28,25,819/- is from out of previous surplu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd rent income. Trust has shown the gross receipts of Rs. 3,27,79,339/- and applied income of Rs. 3,56,05,158/- for objects of the trust. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee trust has debited Rs. 2,30,51,283/- towards educational expenses and the same has been claimed in computation of income also. Besides this on verification of schedule of educational expenses, it was observed by th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ly when the expenditure found to be incurred is without any source. When the expenses are recorded in the regular books of accounts which are duly matched, no addition u/s 69C is called for. The Ld. AR relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in case of CIT vs. Radhika Creations 10 taxmann.com 138 and the order of the Tribunal in case of Command Detective and Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... me of Shri P. D. Shroff Rs. 25,00,000/- and Shri J. D. Panchal Rs. 6,00,000/-. Thus, the Ld. AR submitted that the CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the addition. 6. The Ld. DR submitted that the assessee trust has not mentioned any borrowings in the balance sheet, the contention of the Ld. AR that of borrowed amount from two persons are not justifiable for proving the genuineness and credit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
