Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (11) TMI 299

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... deduction under section 80-I in respect of duty drawback ?. (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the appellant is not entitled to deduction under section 80-I in respect of interest earned on amounts retained by the bank ?" 2. The appellant-firm is engaged in the business of shoe uppers. For the assessment year 2001-02, the appellant filed its return admitting an income of Rs. 2,40,000. The assessment under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was completed on February 16, 2004. While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer has restricted the claim of deduction under section 80-I by disallowing the claim of duty drawback as well as interest on bank de .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as given specifically to reduce the cost of manufacturing the goods. The very scheme of duty drawback is framed and embodied in the statutory provisions in order to relieve the goods to be exported of the burden of customs duties and excise duties. Referring to the decision of the Gujarat High Court that the duty drawback is "derived from" industrial undertaking and eligible for deduction, learned counsel seeks to draw support of the said decision to contend that the order of the Tribunal holding that the same was not "derived from" industrial activity, could not be held to be the correct view. 5. It may be seen that dealing with the inclusion of duty drawback for considering the deduction under section 80HH, this court in the decision rep .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and effective source of income eligible for the grant of relief under section 80HH must be the industrial undertaking itself and not any other source. The said decision was affirmed by the apex court in the decision reported in Pandian Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT [2003] 262 ITR 278, wherein the Supreme Court held that the rules of interpretation would come into play only if there is any doubt with regard to the express language used. Where the words are unequivocal, there is no scope for importing the rule of liberal construction. In the circumstances, the apex court held that the interest derived by the industrial undertaking of the assessee on deposits made with the electricity board for the supply of electricity for running the industrial und .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... deduction in respect of interest on deposits. This court again followed the decisions reported in K. S. Subbiah Pillai and Co. (India) P. Ltd. v. CIT [2003] 260 ITR 304 and CIT v. A. S. Nizar Ahmed and Co. [2003] 259 ITR 244 (Mad) to reject the claim of the assessee that "even assuming that the deposits were made as a pre-condition of the bank for sanctioning the limit, it could not be considered as income from export earnings, as there was no nexus between export earnings and interest income and the interest income was earned from the deposits and not from the export business." Following the principle laid down in the above-mentioned case on the admitted fact that the deposits were made out of profit income for the purpose of availing of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates