9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (11) TMI 37X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the revenue. Adarsh Kumar Goel,J. 1. Following questions of law have been referred for opinion of this Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh arising out of its order dated 18.1.1994 in ITA No.717/Chandi/1988, relating to assessment year 1985-86 :- "1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion under section 36(1) (viii) of the IT Act?" 2. The assessee is a Public Sector Undertaking and raised certain issues for the assessment year in question. The Assessing Officer rejected the view point of the assessee on the issue of claim of deduction for waiver of interest in favour of sister concerns. The Assessing officer also made additions on account of interest remitted of which entries w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ome had already been taxed, as mercantile system of accountancy had been employed. The CIT (A) followed the earlier orders which have not been annexed with the paper book. It appears that the basis for the decision of CIT(A) is that since interest was waived in the year in question, the assessee could claim deduction. Since the revenue has neither filed the orders for the earlier assessment years, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der section 36(1) (viii) for which the reserve already created was not sufficient. The learned CIT(A) therefore directed the assessing officer to afford an opportunity to the assessee to create further reserve. It was further observed by him that a similar issue had been decided in favour of the assessee in the appeal for assessment year 1983-84." 7. Learned counsel for the revenue has not shown ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
