Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (1) TMI 178

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... TMI 962 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH] has rejected the appeal of the appellant by relying upon the decision of the Hon ble Apex Court in the case of M/S. UNICORN INDUSTRIES VERSUS UNION OF INDIA OTHERS [ 2019 (12) TMI 286 - SUPREME COURT] where it was held that a notification has to be issued for providing exemption under the said source of power and that in the absence of notification containing an exemption to such additional duties in the nature of education cess and secondary and higher education cess, they cannot be said to have been exempted. Thus, refund rightly rejected - there are no infirmity in the impugned order which is upheld by dismissing the appeal of the appellant - appeal dismissed. - MR. S. S. GARG, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . As per the procedure, the manufacturer avails Cenvat Credit of duty/cess paid by them on inputs and utilises whole of the CENVAT credit available with them on last day of the month for payment of Central Excise duty and Cess. The balance amount of duty is paid in cash and on application of refund, the refund is granted for payment of Central Excise made in cash only. The refund is granted by way of cash or by way of self credit in PLA. The above said issue is no more res-integra and stands finally decided by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Unicorn Industries vs. Union of India reported as 2019 (370) ELT 3 (S.C) wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court, after considering the provisions of Notification No. 71/2003 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... present case makes it clear that exemption was granted under Section 5A of the Act of 1944, concerning additional duties under the Act of 1957 and additional duties of excise under the Act of 1978. It was questioned on the ground that it provided for limited exemption only under the Acts referred to therein. There is no reference to the Finance Act, 2001 by which NCCD was imposed, and the Finance Acts of 2004 and 2007 were not in vogue. The notification was questioned on the ground that it should have included other duties also. The notification could not have contemplated the inclusion of education cess and secondary and higher education cess imposed by the Finance Acts of 2004 and 2007 in the nature of the duty of excise. The duty on NCC .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is of no avail as it relates to service tax and has no force of law and cannot be said to be binding concerning the interpretation of the provisions by the Courts. The reason employed in SRD Nutrients Private Limited (supra) that there was nil excise duty, as such, additional duty cannot be charged, is also equally unacceptable as additional duty can always be determined and merely exemption granted in respect of a particular excise duty, cannot come in the way of determination of yet another duty based thereupon. The proposition urged that simply because one kind of duty is exempted, other kinds of duties automatically fall, cannot be accepted as there is no difficulty in making the computation of additional duties, which are payable unde .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Private Limited and Bajaj Auto Limited (supra) are clearly per incuriam. The decisions in Modi Rubber (supra) and Rita Textiles Private Limited (supra) are binding on us being of Coordinate Bench, and we respectfully follow them. We did not find any ground to take a different view. 44 . Resultantly, we have no hesitation in dismissing the appeals. The judgment and order of the High Court are upheld, and the appeals are dismissed. No costs. 3. By following the ratio of the decision in the case of M/s Unicorn Industries cited (supra), we are of the considered opinion that there is no infirmity in the impugned order vide which the refund of the education cess and higher secondary education cess has been denied. We uphold the impugned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates