Clarity and Precision in Tax Penalty Proceedings: Insights from a High Court Judgment

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Court, involving the interpretation and application of penalty provisions under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The case, referenced as 2023 (6) TMI 1219 - DELHI HIGH COURT, centers around the intricacies of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Background and Facts The case revolves around an appeal concerning the Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13. The respondent, a private lim .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The critical issue was whether the penalty was justifiably levied in this case. * Specificity in Penalty Notices: A significant point of contention was the Tribunal's observation that the notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) did not specify the exact charge (concealment of income or furnishing .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te the specific limb under which the penalty proceedings are initiated. This requirement stems from the principle that the penal consequences must be clear and unambiguous to the assessee. * Final Decision: Upholding the Tribunal's decision, the High Court concluded that the penalty notice was defective as it failed to specify the exact charge against the assessee. The appeal by the revenu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X