TMI BlogAnalyzing the Tax Implications of Cross-Border Payments: Recognizing the payments as either 'Royalty' or 'Fee for Included Services' u/s 9(1)(vii)X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l matter in question revolves around the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's (ITAT) decision, which was challenged by the Revenue (The Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation Bengaluru) in two separate appeals one at the Karnataka High Court and the other at the Supreme Court of India. The core of the dispute lies in the interpretation of tax liabilities under the Income Tax Act 1961 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act and Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA . Application of Section 201(1) and 201(1A) : The Tribunal's conclusion that conditions for invoking these sections were not met was challenged. Findings and Reasoning The Karnataka High Court, after analyzing the submissions and evidence, upheld the ITAT's decision. Key points from the court' ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the payments. Supreme Court Proceedings ( 2023 (11) TMI 594 - SC ORDER ) The Supreme Court, upon hearing the special leave petition filed by the Revenue, dismissed it. The apex court did not elaborate on the reasons but effectively upheld the decisions of the ITAT and the Karnataka High Court. The AD2PRO Media Solutions Pvt. Ltd. case highlights the complexities involved in the ta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
