TMI Blog2022 (3) TMI 1572X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r herein was either a necessary party or the proper party in the consumer complaints filed for the alleged deficiency of service by the respective hotels (the 4th respondent in the respective writ petitions) in the complaints filed by the 3rd respondent in these writ petitions? - HELD THAT:- Undoubtedly, the petitioner is neither necessary nor a proper party in the said proceeding. The 1st respondent Tribunal ought to have entertained the applications filed by the petitioner for deleting their name from the respective consumer complaints. If there was any complaint regarding the extra collection of tax by the hotels, it was open for the complainant (3rd respondent in the respective writ petitions) to file appropriate applications under S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2 W.P.(MD) No. 21616 of 2019 C.C. No. 108 of 2019 K. Sermakani 3 W.P.(MD) No. 21621 of 2019 C.C. No. 91 of 2019 M. Mydeen Pitchai 4 W.P.(MD) No. 21622 of 2019 C.C. No. 106 of 2019 K. Maheswaran 5 W.P.(MD) No. 21627 of 2019 C.C. No. 97 of 2019 D. Joseph 6 W.P.(MD) No. 21628 of 2019 C.C. No. 109 of 2019 K. Pulithurai 7 W.P.(MD) No. 23500 of 2019 C.C. No. 132 of 2019 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 19 W.P.(MD) No. 23531 of 2019 C.C. No. 140 of 2019 M. Ganesan 20 W.P.(MD) No. 23536 of 2019 C.C. No. 187 of 2019 C. Maharaja 21 W.P.(MD) No. 23537 of 2019 C.C. No. 188 of 2019 D. Joseph 22 W.P.(MD) No. 23543 of 2019 C.C. No. 127 of 2019 C. Maharaja 23 W.P.(MD) No. 23545 of 2019 C.C. No. 129 of 2019 C. Maharaja 24 W.P.(MD) No. 23547 of 2019 C.C. No. 128 of 201 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he complaints filed by the 3rd respondent in these writ petitions. Though the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure is not strictly applicable to the proceeding before the Consumer Forum, nevertheless the principles under the Code of Civil Procedure, as far as joinder, mis-joinder and non-joinder of parties are concerned, is to be followed in the proceeding before it. 5. Undoubtedly, the petitioner is neither necessary nor a proper party in the said proceeding. The 1st respondent Tribunal ought to have entertained the applications filed by the petitioner for deleting their name from the respective consumer complaints. If there was any complaint regarding the extra collection of tax by the hotels, it was open for the complainant (3rd ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
