TMI Blog2019 (3) TMI 2052X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... :- In judgment dated 24.08.2017 passed in a batch of original applications including one bearing No. 2712/2016 titled Dr. Santosh Kumar Sharma vs. Union of India Ors. [ 2018 (11) TMI 1950 - DELHI HIGH COURT] , which involved exactly the same question, the CAT had ruled in favour of the AYUSH medical practitioners and held that they are entitled to benefit of the retirement age of 65 years at par ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ministrative Tribunal, Principal Bench New Delhi in OA No. 2503/2017 titled Dr. Brijesh Kumari vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors. The issue involved is the extension of the age of retirement for medical practitioners covered by AYUSH from 62 years to 65 years, as in the case of allopathic doctors. 2. In judgment dated 24.08.2017 passed in a batch of original applications including o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ns including W.P. (C) No. 637/2018, 644/2018, 9461/2018 and 610/2018. 4. The issue involved in this petition is also the same. 5. Accordingly, following the decision made by the Co-ordinate Bench in W.P. (C) No. 8704/2017 titled North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Santosh Kumar Sharma Ors., and in other matters mentioned above the present petition stands dismissed, on the grounds and for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
