Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (3) TMI 270

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... there under to evade tax under this act." 4. The search operation started on 16.11.2023 at 5:30 P.M and continued till 17.11.2023 around 5 AM. During the search operation, documents and other records were inspected and consequently, as per the Petitioner, it was orally and vaguely alleged the Petitioner has evaded GST on its transactions. Further, the statement of the authorized representative of the petitioner was also recorded under duress and coercion. 5. Further, as per the Petitioner he cooperated and furnished all the statutory records maintained in the business premises. 6. As per the Petitioner, he was made to deposit an amount of Rs. 15,06,342 (towards alleged stock variation) and an amount of Rs. 25,00,000 (towards ITC reversal alleged to be illegible) totaling to Rs. 40,06,342 vide FORM GST DRC-03, without any statutory demand being raised by the Respondents and merely on the basis of alleged discrepancy noticed during the search operation. 7. Said amounts were deposited by the Petitioner at 3:10 AM and 3:18 AM, during the course of search operation, in the presence of the Respondents at the premises of the petitioner. 8. As per the Petitioner, no intimation of For .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 54. This regime is set out in Section 73 of the 2017 Act. 55. Broadly, this regime also applies, where a notice has been issued under sub-section (1) of Section 73, and the proper officer serves a statement containing details of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized for such periods other than those covered under sub-section (1) of Section 73. 56. The important aspect to be kept in mind, is that the regime given in Section 73 of the Act operates in cases which do not involve fraud or wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. 57. In cases which involve one or more of the aforementioned ingredients i.e., fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax, pari materia provisions are contained in Section 74 of the 2017 Act, with small variations. 58. In these cases as well, latitude has been given to the person chargeable with tax, to pay monies towards tax, along with interest, based on self-ascertainment, before issuance of notice under subsection (1) of Section 74 of the 2017 Act, with a caveat that fifteen per cent of such self-ascertained tax is required to be paid by way of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [i.e., the acknowledgement of acceptance of payment] where tax, interest and penalty are ascertained by the proper officer, under Rule 142(1A). ***** ***** ***** 76. The malaise of officials seeking to recover tax dues (in contrast to voluntary payments being made by assesses towards tax dues) during search, inspection or investigation was sought to be addressed by the GST-Investigation, CBIC via Instruction No. 01/2022-2023 dated 25.05.2022. For the sake of convenience, the said instruction is extracted hereafter: "Date : 25 May, 2022 Instruction No. 01/2022-2023 [GST - Investigation] Subject : Deposit of tax during the course of search, inspection or investigation-reg. 1. During the course of search, inspection or investigation, sometimes the taxpayers opt for deposit of their partial or full GST liability arising out of the issue pointed out by the department during the course of such search, inspection or investigation by furnishing DRC-03. Instances have been noticed where some of the taxpayers after voluntarily depositing GST liability through DRC-03 have alleged use of force and coercion by the officers for making 'recovery' during the course of search or insp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... / short payment of taxes before or at any stage of such proceedings. The tax officer should however, inform the taxpayers regarding the provisions of voluntary tax payments through DRC-03. 5. Pr. Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners, CGST Zones and Pr. Director General, DGGI are advised that in case, any complaint is received from a taxpayer regarding use of force or coercion by any of their officers for getting the amount deposited during search or inspection or investigation, the same may be enquired at the earliest and in case of any wrongdoing on the part of any tax officer, strict disciplinary action as per law may be taken against the defaulting officers. (Vijay Mohan Jain) Commissioner (GST-Inv.), CBIC" 77. It appears that this Instruction was issued by the GST Investigation Wing, CBIC, in the backdrop of an order dated 16.02.2021, passed by the Gujarat High Court in the matter of Bhumi Associate v. Union of India, SCA No. 3196 of 2021, order dated 16-2- 2021 (Guj), whereby the following wholesome directions were issued- "The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs as well as the Chief Commissioner of Central/State Tax of the State of Gujarat are her .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... no material placed on record by respondent to show as to why petitioner would voluntarily deposit the said amount when there was no claim made against the petitioner as on the date of deposit. 15. Therefore, the amounts that were deposited on behalf of petitioner lacked voluntariness. Accordingly, said amount are liable to be returned with interest. 16. Relying upon the decision of a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 05.12.2023 in W.P. (C) No. 158/2023, titled as 'Neeraj Paper Marketing Ltd. Vs. Special Commissioner, Department of Trade and Taxes, GNCTD & Ors.', learned counsel for the respondents submits that since part of the amount deposited was by debit from the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger and the same is to be re-credited to the Electronic Credit Ledger of the Petitioner, no interest is liable to be paid as the amount standing in the Electronic Credit Ledger does not earn any interest and is available to a party to claim as a refund or as an adjustment towards the tax due by filing an appropriate application and in the absence of an application being filed, no interest would be liable to be paid on the credit amount in the Electronic Credit Ledger. 17. We find .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates