Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (5) TMI 403

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the order impugned; or (ii) where vires of an Act, Rules, Notification or any of its provisions has been challenged; or (iii) where an order prejudicial to the writ petitioner has been passed in total violation of principles of natural justice. Opportunity of personal hearing - HELD THAT:- The action taken against the petitioner under Section 74(9) of the Act does not provide for personal hearing to be given to the concerned person chargeable with tax or penalty. It only states that the proper officer shall after considering the representation, if any, made by the person chargeable with tax determine the amount of tax, interest and penalty due from such person and issue an order. It has been argued that sub-clauses of Section 75 of the Act relate to the procedure to be followed by the Officer after remand of the matter by the appellate authority or tribunal or the court and sub-section (4) should be read in that context and it requires that an opportunity of hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty or where an adverse decision is contemplated against such person - the petitioner has also argued that Section 75(4 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rding due discharge of tax liabilities. A Physical visit of the premises of the petitioner was conducted by the Revenue Officials on 11.05.2022. Another notice was issued in FORM GST ADT-01 to the petitioner on 05.01.2023 on similar grounds. The petitioner complied with all the directions issued by the respondents, however, it was not given any information regarding the action taken in furtherance of audit notices dated 05.05.2022 and 05.01.2023 by the respondent authorities. As per the provisions of Section 65(4) of the Act, if the respondents failed to complete the audit exercise after the lapse of three months from the date of audit, unless the said period has been explicitly extended, it shall be deemed to have concluded upon expiration of the said period. No draft audit report was prepared or issued to the petitioner in FORM GST ADT-02. A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner on 07.08.2023 relying upon the audit FORM GST ADT-01, that were issued on 05.05.2022 and on 05.01.2023. No audit report was ever issued to the petitioner. 4. The impugned show cause notice does not provide any date, place and time of hearing despite the same being mandatory procedure. In the Colu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... quently, it deserved to be quashed in exercise of powers conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 9. The Co-ordinate Bench dealt with the notice issued to the petitioner under Section 75(4) of the Act and observed that under the column meant for the date, time and place of personal hearing, the officer has noted NA (not applicable) and then has quoted the language of Section 75(4) of the Act. To decide the controversy, it is appropriate to quote the judgement of Bharat Mint Allied Chemicals (supra) in extenso :- 8. Section 75(4) of the Act, 2017 reads as under:- An opportunity of hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person. 9. From perusal of Section 75(4) of the Act, 2017 it is evident that opportunity of hearing has to be granted by authorities under the Act, 2017 where either a request is received from the person chargeable with tax or penalty for opportunity of hearing or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person. Thus, where an adverse decision is contemplated against the person, such a person even need not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s not a complete bar to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and has referred to exceptions that have been carved out to alternative remedy by the Hon'ble Supreme Court with regard to three cases i.e. (i) where there is complete lack of jurisdiction in the officer or authority to take the action or to pass the order impugned; or (ii) where vires of an Act, Rules, Notification or any of its provisions has been challenged; or (iii) where an order prejudicial to the writ petitioner has been passed in total violation of principles of natural justice. There are other exceptions also, which have been mentioned in sub-clauses (iv) to (xi) of the Division Bench judgment, which are being quoted herein-below:- (iv) Where enforcement of any fundamental right is sought by the petitioner. (v) Where procedure required for decision has not been adopted. (vi) Where Tax is levied without authority of law. (vii) Where decision is an abuse of process of law. (viii) Where palpable injustice shall be caused to the petitioner, if he is forced to adopt remedies under the statute for enforcement of any fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India. ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... quest has been received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty or where any adverse decision is contemplated against any such person. 14. Learned counsel for the State-respondents has pointed out that Section 74 of the Act, which relates to determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized by reason of fraud or any willful-misstatement or suppression of facts. Section 74 of the Act in its entirety is quoted below:- Section 74. Determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised by reason of fraud or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts. (1) Where it appears to the proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or where input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised by reason of fraud, or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax, he shall serve notice on the person chargeable with tax which has not been so paid or which has been so short paid or to whom the refund has erroneously been made, or who has wrongly availed or utilised input tax credit, requiring him to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... determine the amount of tax, interest and penalty due from such person and issue an order. (10) The proper officer shall issue the order under sub-section (9) within a period of five years from the due date for furnishing of annual return for the financial year to which the tax not paid or short paid or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised relates to or within five years from the date of erroneous refund. (11) Where any person served with an order issued under subsection (9) pays the tax along with interest payable thereon under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to fifty per cent. of such tax within thirty days of communication of the order, all proceedings in respect of the said notice shall be deemed to be concluded. 15. The action taken against the petitioner under Section 74(9) of the Act does not provide for personal hearing to be given to the concerned person chargeable with tax or penalty. It only states that the proper officer shall after considering the representation, if any, made by the person chargeable with tax determine the amount of tax, interest and penalty due from such person and issue an order. 16. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, has point .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er sub-section (1) of section 74 is not sustainable for the reason that the charges of fraud or any willful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax has not been established against the person to whom the notice was issued, the proper officer shall determine the tax payable by such person, deeming as if the notice were issued under sub-section (1) of section 73. (3) Where any order is required to be issued in pursuance of the direction of the Appellate Authority or Appellate Tribunal or a court, such order shall be issued within two years from the date of communication of the said direction. (4) An opportunity of hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person. (5) The proper officer shall, if sufficient cause is shown by the person chargeable with tax, grant time to the said person and adjourn the hearing for reasons to be recorded in writing: Provided that no such adjournment shall be granted for more than three times to a person during the proceedings. (6) The proper officer, in his order, shall set out the relevant facts and the basis of his .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates