9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (5) TMI 1201X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in Form No. 10AB on 30.03.2023 seeking registration under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of Sec.80G. It transpired that the assessee trust was incorporated on 04.11.1992 and it commenced its activities on 17.01.1992. The assessee was granted provisional approval in Form No. 10AC u/s 80G(5)(iv) for the period commencing from 21.10.2022 to AY 2025-26. The first proviso to Sec. 80G(5), provided timeline for an application to be filed under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of Sec.80G. As per sub-clause (iii) of this proviso, the assessee was required to file this application at least before 6 months prior to expiry of provisional approval or within 6 months from the date of commencement of its activities, whic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... trusts / institutions registered u/s 10(23C) and 12AB. The said Circular did not mention any such extension of due date for filing Form No. 10AB to get approval u/s 80G. Therefore, the application was treated as time barred and rejected as non-maintainable. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. 5. It is admitted fact that the assessee is an old trust and it has already commenced its activities on 17.01.1992. It could further be noted that the assessee has already received provisional approval u/s 80G(5)(iv) for a period commencing from 21.10.2022 to AY 2025-26. It sought approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) by filing Form No. 10AB on 30.03.2023 which has been rejected by Ld. CIT(E) on the ground that the assessee had violated the man ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... section 80G(5) of the Act, we find no difference in continuing hardship as recognized by CBDT even in filing Form No. 10AB for renewal of recognition u/s. 80G of the Act under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. In our view, this being a genuine hardship case, which is recognized by Revenue or CBDT by issuing a general circular, we are of the view that this specific provision of clause (iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5) cannot be excluded and or it has not been the intention of the CBDT while issuing the circular. There cannot be a distinction within the same provision without bringing out any exception and even this provision is for the benefit of the donors who are donating money to the charitable trusts for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... DT Circular would apply to Form No. 10AB as well. 6. The bench also takes note of the latest decision of Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Sri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust in WP Nos.27030 & ors. of 2024 order dated 02.04.2024 wherein Hon'ble Court has held that clause 5(ii) of Circular No. 6 of 2023 dated 24.05.2023 is illegitimate, arbitrary and ultra vires the constitution of India. It has been held as under: - 7. In the result, these Writ Petitions are allowed on the following terms: - (i) The clause 5(ii) of Circular No. 6 of 2023 bearing F.No.370133/06/2023-TPL, dated 24.05.2023 of the first respondent is declared as illegitimate, arbitrary, and ultra vires the Constitution of India; (ii) The respondents are directe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
