Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (8) TMI 331

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ava Sheva, is to the finding that 'medical grade monitor' is not separately enumerated for the purpose of 'rate of duty' under Customs Act, 1962 and that any monitor, irrespective of intended use or technical specification, is liable to be classified within heading 8529 of First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The claim of the importer is that amenability to use in the medical world permits the impugned goods to be classified against heading 9018 of First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 2. The impugned goods had been imported against 56 bills of entry filed between 2nd April 2016 and 9th January 2019 claiming the benefit of notification no. 50/2017-Cus dated 30th June 2017 (at serial no. 563A) to avail concessional rate of duty .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ggest that, in terms note 2(a) in chapter 90 to the First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975, parts and accessories which are classifiable under a specific heading did not merit classification with the articles to which it would be connected. 3. According to Learned Counsel for the appellant, the impugned goods, having been imported for supply to hospitals and medical establishments and deployed in conjunction with equipment to which patients would be connected for display of medical parameters, were not ordinary monitors. It was also submitted that recourse to a residuary heading even as the impugned goods were so obviously connected with medical diagnosis was not in accordance with the General Rules for Interpretation of the Import Tar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... surgical instrument and of the decision in Commissioner of Customs, Delhi - III v. Bausch and Lomb Eyecare India Pvt Ltd [2017 (355) ELT 556 (Tr.-Del.)] that a medical device is one that is used by the medical fraternity. 5. Learned Authorized Representative submitted that 'monitor' of every kind is covered by heading 8528 of First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and that, by no stretch, would such goods be classifiable with instruments and appliances of heading 9018 of First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 6. On a careful consideration of the records, we find that the show cause notice proposed that the description corresponding to tariff item 8528 5900 of First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was more apt and to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Hence, the decision cited by Learned Counsel on inapplicability of residual tariff line does not apply to facts of the case. It is not in dispute that the goods are 'monitors' but the claim of the appellant that the goods fall within the ambit of medical equipment is. In the light of the comprehensiveness of the adopted heading to discredit, summarily enough, the claim of the appellant that residuary entry within a heading intended for instruments and appliances is more specific, we see no reason to disturb the classification proposed in the show cause notice and confirmed in the impugned order. 8. We, however, find that the impugned order has traversed beyond the show cause notice in attempting to classify the goods exclusively by resort .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates