9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (5) TMI 1463X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l Vasudeva, Adv., Mr. Prateek Yadav, AOR. For the Respondent : Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR, Mr. Mirza Kayesh Begg, Adv., Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi,, Adv., Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv., Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv., Mr. Argha Roy, Adv., Ms. Ojaswini Gupta,Adv., Ms. Ruby, Adv. ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following 1. The petitioner is in custody since last more than two years in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the pretext that the Investigation Officer may also be a panch witness who has yet to examine. The High Court also rejected the bail application affirming those findings by the impugned order. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondentState submits that in the facts of this case, the Investigation Officer may be treated as panch witness; therefore, the High Court has rightly reject ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act may, in such circumstances, be considered. 7. In view of the above, we are inclined to allow this petition and direct to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing the suitable bail bonds and sureties and on such other terms and conditions as may be deemed fit by the trial Court. 8. It is needless to observe that the petitioner shall regularly attend the trial until ex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
