9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (10) TMI 13X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Adv. Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kakar, Adv. For M/S. Sharan & Associates , AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Suryaprakash V. Raju, A.S.G. Ms. Mrigank Pathak, Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Nidhi Saini, Adv. Ms. Shweta Desai, Adv. Mr. Kshitiz Agarwal , Adv ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is bein ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed bail. 4. Learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent vehemently contended that the charge is in the predicate offence and in any case, the period of incarceration undergone cannot be taken as a ground in the present case. It is further submitted that allegations are extremely serious and, therefore, no indulgence is warranted. It is the further case of the prosecution tha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ot gained anything. Therefore, without commenting on the entitlement of the appellant to receive the copies of the document relied upon the prosecution, we are of the view that taking into consideration not only the period of incarceration but also the trial getting delayed owing to numerous witnesses, he is entitled for bail at this stage. 7. In such view of the matter, the impugned order stands ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
