TMI Blog1984 (11) TMI 63X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... very often some courts act as if furnishing a bank guarantee would meet the ends of justice. No governmental business or for that matter no business of any kind can be run on mere bank guarantees. Liquid cash is necessary for the running of a Government as indeed any other enterprise. We consider that where matters of public revenue are concerned, it is of utmost importance to realise that interim orders ought not to be granted merely because prima facie case has been shown. More is required. The balance of convenience must be clearly in favour of the making of an interim order and there should not be the slightest indication of a likelihood of prejudice to the public interest. We are very sorry to remark that these considerations have not been borne in mind by the High Court and an interim order of this magnitude had been granted for the mere asking. The appeal is allowed with costs. - Civil Appeal Nos. 4742-43 of 1984 - - - Dated:- 30-11-1984 - Judge(s) : A. P. SEN., E. S. VENKATARAMAIAH., O. CHINNAPPA REDDY JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by CHINNAPPA REDDY J.-It is indeed a great pity-and, we wish we did not have to say it but we are afraid we will be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , should be an exception and not the rule. It is needless to stress that a levy or impost does not become bad as soon as a writ petition is instituted in order to assail the validity of the levy. So also there is no warrant for presuming the levy to be bad at the very threshold of the proceedings. The only consideration at that juncture is to ensure that no prejudice is occasioned to the rate payers in case they ultimately succeed at the conclusion of the proceedings. This object can be attained by requiring the body or authority levying the impost to give an undertaking to refund or adjust against future dues, the levy of tax or rate or a part thereof, as the case may be, in the event of the entire levy or a part thereof being ultimately held to be invalid by the. court without obliging the taxpayers to institute a civil suit in order to claim the amount already recovered from them. On the other hand, the court cannot be unmindful of the need to protect the authority levying the tax, for, at that stage, the Court has to proceed on the hypothesis that the challenge may or may not succeed. The court has to show awareness of the fact that, in case like the present, a municipality c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mills Ltd. [1985] 154 ITR 135, we had occasion to consider an interim order passed by the Calcutta High Court in regard to a matter no part of the cause of action relating to which appeared to arise within the jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court. In that case, the interim order practically granted the very prayers in the writ petition. We were forced to observe (at p. 138): " It is obvious that the interim order is of a drastic character with great potential for mischief. The principal prayer in the writ petition is the challenge to the order made or proposed to be made under clause 8B of the Import (Control) Order. The interim order in terms of prayers (j) and (k) has the effect of practically allowing the writ petition at the stage of admission without hearing the opposite parties. While we do not wish to say that a drastic interim order may never be passed without hearing the opposite parties, even if the circumstances justify it, we are very firmly of the opinion that a statutory order such as the one made in the present case under clause 8B of the Import (Control) Order ought not to have been stayed without at least hearing those that made the order. Such a stay may lea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... are at New Delhi, one would have expected the writ petition to be filed either in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana or in the Delhi High Court. The writ petitioners, however, have chosen the Calcutta High Court as the forum perhaps because one of the interlocutory reliefs which is sought is in respect of a consignment of beef tallow which has arrived at the Calcutta Port. An inevitable result of the filing of writ petitions elsewhere than at the place where the concerned offices and the relevant records are located is to delay prompt return and contest. We do not desire to probe further into the question whether the writ petition was filed by design or accident in the Calcutta High Court when the office of the company is in the State of Punjab and all the principal respondents are in Delhi. But we do feel disturbed that such writ petitions are often deliberately filed in distant High Courts, as part of a manoeuvre in a legal battle, so as to render it difficult for the officials at Delhi to move applications to vacate stay where it becomes necessary to file such applications. " In Union of India v. Jain Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. (C.A. No. 11450 of 1983), Chandrachud C.J., A. P. Se ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urt to intervene and give appropriate interim relief. In cases where denial of interim relief may lead to public mischief, grave irreparable private injury or shake a citizen's faith in the impartiality of public administration, a court may well be justified in granting interim relief against public authority. But since the law presumes that public authorities function properly and bona fide with due regard to the public interest, a court must be circumspect in granting interim orders of far reaching dimensions or orders causing administrative, burdensome inconvenience or orders preventing collection of public revenue for no better reason than that the parties have come to the court alleging prejudice, inconvenience or harm and that a prima facie case has been shown. There can be and there are no hard and fast rules. But prudence, discretion and circumspection are called for. There are several other vital considerations apart from the existence of a prima facie case. There is the question of balance of convenience. There is the question of irreparable injury. There is the question of the public interest. There are many such factors worthy of consideration. We often wonder why in th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ts that there are decisions of the supreme appellate tribunal which do not attract the unanimous approval of all members of the judiciary ...... But the judicial system only works if some one is allowed to have the last word and that last word, once spoken, is loyally accepted " (See observations of Lord Hailsham and Lord Diplock in Broome v. Cassell). The better wisdom of the court below must yield to the higher wisdom of the court above. That is the strength of the hierarchical judicial system. In Cassell v. Broome [1972] AC 1027, commenting on the Court of Appeal's comment that Rookes v. Barnard [1964] AC 1129, was rendered per incuriam, Lord Diplock observed (p. 1131). " The Court of Appeal found themselves able to disregard the decision of this House in Rookes v. Barnard by applying to it the label per incuriam. That label is relevant only to the right of an appellate court to decline to follow one of its own previous decisions, not to its right to disregard a decision of a higher appellate court or to the right of a judge of the High Court to disregard a decision of the Court of Appeal." It is needless to add that in India under art. 141 of the Constitution, the law decla ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i F. S. Nariman, learned counsel, however appeared for the respondent. We do not have the slightest doubt that the orders of the learned single judge as well as Division Bench are wholly unsustainable and should never have been made. Even assuming that the company had established a prima facie case, about which we do not express any opinion, we do not think that it was sufficient justification for granting the interim orders as was done by the High Court. There was no question of any balance of convenience being in favour of the respondent-company. The balance of convenience was certainly in favour of the Government of India. Governments are not run on mere bank guarantees. We notice that very often some courts act as if furnishing a bank guarantee would meet the ends of justice. No governmental business or for that matter no business of any kind can be run on mere bank guarantees. Liquid cash is necessary for the running of a Government as indeed any other enterprise. We consider that where matters of public revenue are concerned, it is of utmost importance to realise that interim orders ought not to be granted merely because prima facie case has been shown. More is required. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
