TMI Blog1988 (3) TMI 62X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dditional Solicitor-General (Miss Indu Malhotra and Mrs. Sushma Suri, Advocates, with him), for the appellant. [Judgment per : Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.] - This is an appeal under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter called 'the Act'). The appeal is directed against the Order of the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter called 'the CE ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Collector of Appeals who concurred with the Assistant Collector upholding the duty. Aggrieved thereby the respondent filed an appeal before the CEGAT. The Tribunal in the Judgment under appeal, relied on its decision in the case of Sanghvi Enterprises, Jammu Tawi v. Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh -1984 (16) E.L.T 317 and the Karnataka High Court in the case of Y. Moideen Kunhi Others v. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and different article emerges having a distinct name, character and use. The use of expression 'manufacture' was explained in the case of Allenburry Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Ramakrishna Dalmia Others - 1973 2 S.C.R 257. In State of Orissa Others v. The Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. Another - 1985 3 S.C.R 26 which was a decision on the Orissa Sales Tax Act, this question was considered in the b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
