1993 (3) TMI 114

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... order dated 26th May, 1992, the Tribunal rejected the application of the petitioner for interim order and directed the petitioner to pay entire amount of duty within 12 weeks. The petitioner challenged the said order of the Tribunal before this Court. By order dated 27th August, 1992 (Annexure 8 to the writ petition) this Court in the interest of justice allowed the period of three months to the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , the petitioner has come up to this Court. Grievance of the petitioner is that it was not heard on merits and that the Tribunal took the view that the petitioner was not financially handicapped, because profits had been reflected in the balance sheet. The petitioner would have established financial hardship had it been given opportunity in that behalf urged by the petitioner. It is contended that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X