9911796707
TMI Blog1999 (4) TMI 91X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r dated 27-5-1998 passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi whereby the petitioner's appeal has been dismissed for non-compliance of the conditions of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act (hereinafter referred to as `the Act'). 2.I have heard Shri A.P. Mathur, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Surya Prakash, learned Standing Counsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he pre-deposit of the balance was waived. Against the said order the petitioner came to this Court in writ petition No. 5 of 1994 and an interim order dated 4-1-1994 was made by this Court that the petitioner's appeal shall not be dismissed on account of non-deposit of Rs. 75,000/-. The writ petition remained pending in this Court for more than three years and ultimately by order dated 28-7-1997 t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y or partially. In the present case the Tribunal had partially waived the conditions and directed the petitioner to deposit only Rs. 75,000/-. The petitioner prolonged the matter through the aforesaid writ petition which was ultimately dismissed. Even thereafter it did not comply with the Tribunal's order and continued to *** counsel for the petitioner contended that the demand was unjustified and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
