TMI Blog2007 (8) TMI 363X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd certain liability for duty came to be imposed on them. It was stated that the work done by them was not a mere job work but they had supplied additional materials. The main matter is pending before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), South Zonal Bench, Chennai-6 in E/1146/2003. 2. Pending appeal, the petitioner-company took out an application for waiver of predepo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... th filing of the present petition. 3. At the time of writ petition this Court has passed an order to deposit a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs without prejudice to their contention. However aggrieved by that interim order, the TANSI had filed a Writ Appeal being W.A. No. 263 of 2005 wherein the Division Bench was of the opinion that making them to deposit of the amount will make their Writ Petition infructuo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s been delayed for the past three years. 8. The petitioner TANSI being a State owned company the amount directed to be deposited is negligible is considered to the investment of the petitioner-company. 9. Under these circumstances the Writ Petition is misconceived and will stand dismissed. However considering the fact that the matter has been pending for several years, the respondents are dire ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|