Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1993 (8) TMI 86

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... issued under Rule 12 of Central Excise Rules, 1944, for grant of rebate of excise duty paid on goods exported during the relevant time was in the following words :- "(vii) The value of goods at the time of exportation is, in the opinion of the Collector, not less than the amount of the rebate claimed;" 3. Shri Sanjay Khanna, Deputy Legal Manager of the applicant's firm appeared for a personal hearing on 27-7-1993 and reiterated the submissions made in the revision application. According to Shri Khanna the word "Value" as mentioned in the Proviso (vii) has nowhere been defined; that the lower authorities were wrong in holding that value for exportation was to be determined in terms of Section 4 of Central Excises Salt Act. According t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r respective scope, therefore, assessable value under Section 4 relates to pre-clearance value of goods i.e. before they have suffered duty incidence whereas under the Notification No. 197/62 the value at the time of export is clearly the value-cum- duty (or FOB). As stated above no definition of value perse is given in the Central Excise Act. The word "value" is contextual viz. "at the time of their return to the factory" (Rule 97) or "at the time of export" (Notification No. 197/62) or "where under the Act...... with reference to value, such value" (Section 4). If one were to graft the definition of value from Section 4 into Notification under Rule 12 (as done by Collector (Appeals) the words "at the time of exportation" become redundant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y. 7. While taking the above view Government also appreciate the fact that apart from encouraging export, it is necessary that the benefits under Rule 12 and 13 which are complementary provisions are equally available to exporters. It cannot be that a person who claims rebate under Rule 12, after having paid duty should suffer (by getting no rebate at all if ex-duty value is less than rebate claim) as against an exporter who opts for export under Rule 13 without payment of any duty and clears the goods under bond. 8. Therefore, not only, with a view to encourage export but also in law and equity and as "value" is not defined but is a contextual term Government conclude that the "value" under Notification No. 197/62 should be given the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates