Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2003 (11) TMI 174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R-1984. 2. The Appeal No. 725 has been filed by M/s. Thawardas Wadhumal (CHA No. 11/106) proprietary firm against Order-in-Original No. CCP/ADJ/ACB/2001, dated 18-4-2001 passed by Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) by which the Commissioner found that the proprietor of M/s. Thawardas Wadhumal (CHA No. 11/106) viz., Shri Jairam T. Asrani and his employee Shri Deepak Parekh, knowingly, wilfuly and deliberately aided and abetted a passenger Shri Lingala Raja Reddy inasmuch as Shri Parekh prepared the baggage declaration form, Transfer of Residence form and check list of the goods and also declared less quantity of goods (as per request of the Pax Lingla Raja Reddy) and Shri Ansari singed all the documents and therefore not only they were n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he was asked by one Shri Harifbhai to carry the packages in his tempo from U.B. Center, Mumbai to Manish Market and no documents were given to him. These goods found in the tempo were seized in the reasonable belief that they are imported into India in contravention of the provisions of Customs Act, 1962 and therefore the same are liable for confiscation. Similarly, detailed examination of packages loaded in the tempo No. MRL-9087 were also conducted which revealed that the packages were having marks such as BDF No. 739/20-5-99. PP No. G-68980 LRR. These goods were also seized. The driver of the tempo No. MRL 9087 informed that he undertakes the job of transportation of goods for any customer and on 21-5-99 at about 4.00 PM one person by na .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd after reading the contents of the BDF, the signatures were obtained on the documents and handed over the same to Shri Deepak Parekh for further procedures. Shri Deepak Parekh the dock clerk of CHA 11/106 admitted that he is looking after the baggage work at Mumbai Docks and at Sahar Airport and he gets passengers from the Blue Gate and explained that the passenger by name Shri Lingala Raj Reddy having passport No. G-681980 approached him on 20-5-99 when he was standing at the Blue gate and enquired whether his baggage could be cleared under TR facilities. The BDF form was prepared as per the list of the goods given to him by the said passenger and after obtaining the signatures of Shri Jairam T. Asrani, Proprietor of M/s. Thawardas Wadhu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent appellant based on the above enquiry. No efforts appear to have been made to trace out Shri Harifbhai. 4. After hearing both sides and considering the material on records it is found :- (a) This seizure is affected from two tempos, out of the seven tempos intercepted by Marine and Preventive Officers of Customs Commissionerate (Preventive), Bombay. Orders in regard of two other tempos out of the same interception were dealt with, in the case of Ameya Clearing Agency [2003 (158) E.L.T. 529]. Therein one of the Members of this Bench after considering the material on record and hearing the appellants therein, the CHA firm and the Dock Clerk came to the conclusion that - (i) The goods cleared on BDF which was filed by a passeng .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bring out any additional material on record of any such acts on the performance of CHA functions on part of the CHA firm and Dock Clerk, the penalties on them were not upheld. (iii) After relying upon the decision of the case of Mohan Meakin Ltd. - [2000 (115) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)], the penalty imposed under Section 112(b) in the proceedings initiated by the Commissioner (Preventive) was not upheld. (b) In the present case, also, the factual situation remains the same as in the case of Ameya Clearing Agency we would approve the findings as arrived at in the case of Ameya Clearing Agency [2003 (158) E.L.T. 529], which was relied upon by the ld. Advocate for the appellant and come to a conclusion that penalty imposed under Section 112(a) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates