Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2004 (11) TMI 246

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2-2003 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the appellant's appeal and has held that the value of Air Handlers is required to be added in the assessable value of the Split Air Conditioners. He rejected the plea that the appellants had purchased the air handlers from Delhi in open market under proper invoices in small quantities and stocked in their trading premises. The appellants have .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Siemens Ltd. v. CCE, Aurangabad - 2002 (150) E.L.T. 422 (T) = 2002 (53) RLT 1096 (CEGAT-Mum.) wherein the cost of batteries which were purchased separately and supplied to the buyers was held to be not addable to the value of the Uninterrupted Power Supply systems cleared from the factory. He also relied on the judgment rendered in the case of Frick India Ltd. Another v. CCE, Delhi - 2002 (1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of bought out items installed at customer's premises cannot be added in the value of excisable goods cleared from the manufacturer's factory. 2. The learned JDR reiterated the Commissioner's findings. It is his submission that the sales invoices of the Air Handling Machine purchased by the assessee cannot be considered to be authentic and pleaded that the same should not be accepted as per the f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e paid sales tax on the purchased items viz. Air Handling Equipments, then it cannot be said to have been manufactured within the premises of the appellants. It is not the case of the department that the appellants have manufactured these items and they had all the facilities for manufacturing the same. There is no independent evidence of the appellant having manufactured it in their premises. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates