Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2005 (3) TMI 283

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the various evidence mentioned in the earlier Tribunal's Final Order dated 13-9-2001 that both units are situated at different premises having different small-scale Registration number, Central Excise registration number, GST registration, CST registration number and separate Income-tax PAN number. It has also been mentioned therein that they have been filing RT 12 returns which have been duly approved by the Department and both of them have discharged duty liability on the goods cleared by them during the financial year 1992-1993 and 1993-94. In view of these facts, non-issue of show cause notices to M/s. VME Foundary Pvt. Ltd. makes the proceedings assailable as the Department have not been given any opportunity of proving to them tha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Central Excise has confirmed demand of Rs. 15,68,582.25 and penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs. 2. Shri R. Raghwan, learned Advocate, submitted that out of total duty confirmed against them the Appellants are not contesting the demand of duty amounting to Rs. 2,81,223/-. In view of this the said demand of duty is upheld. 3. Learned Advocate mentioned that the appellants manufacture excisable goods falling under Chapter 84 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act; that there is another unit functioning in the name and style of M/s. VME Foundary (Pvt.) Ltd. The department has made out a case that value of clearances of both the units is required to be clubbed for the purpose of levying the Central Excise duty; that an Order-in-Original No. 96/ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... decisions in support of his contention that the value of clearance of the Appellants and other units are not required to be clubbed as both are separate entity. Some of the decisions are as under :- (1) Super Printers v. CCE, Hyderabad - 1987 (30) E.L.T. 745 (Tri.). (2) Swastika Metal Works v. CCE - 1989 (43) E.L.T. 320. (3) CCE v. Srinagar Cosmetic Ltd. - 1988 (35) E.L.T. 581. (4) Hindustan Foam Industries v. CCE - 1990 (48) E.L.T. 33 (Tri.). (5) International Dyestuff Manufacturing Co. v. CCE - 1991 (53) E.L.T. 85 (Tri.). 4. Countering the arguments, Shri A. Jayachandran, learned Departmental Representative, reiterated the findings as contained in the impugned order and submitted that one Shri Ravinder had floated both the units for the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sidered the submissions of both the sides. When the matter was heard first time by the Tribunal against Order-in-Original No. 96/96, dated 22-9-96, the appellants had submitted that they were only contesting the clubbing of two units and non-issue of show cause notice to one of the units which is a mandatory requirement. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions of both the sides, had set aside the said Order and remanded the matter for de novo consideration after following the principle of natural justice vide Final Order No. 1585/2001, dated 15-9-2001. The Commissioner, in the impugned order, has specifically mentioned in Para 22 that one of the submissions made by the Appellants was that the earlier order confirming the demand trea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of a unit is being questioned by the Department, an opportunity has to be extended to the said unit to present its own case. We, further observe from the various evidence mentioned in the earlier Tribunal's Final Order dated 13-9-2001 that both units are situated at different premises having different small-scale Registration number, Central Excise registration number, GST registration, CST registration number and separate Income-tax PAN number. It has also been mentioned therein that they have been filing RT 12 returns which have been duly approved by the Department and both of them have discharged duty liability on the goods cleared by them during the financial year 1992-1993 and 1993-94. In view of these facts, non-issue of show cause n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates