2005 (8) TMI 187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ct of the Final Order No. 855-856/2005, dated 1-6-2005 [2005 (192) E.L.T. 892 (T)]. 2. Ld. Counsel Shri G. Shivadass, while appearing for the appellants contended that in the above Final Order, the Tribunal while confirming that Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 2,52,45,268/- has upheld the demand of interest inspite of the fact that the duty was paid much before the issue of show cause notic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he non-consideration of the well settled position in law by the Tribunal is a mistake apparent on the face of the record as held by the Tribunal in the case of Richardson Cruddas Ltd. v. CCE reported in 2002 (145) E.L.T. 168. Hence he prays the Bench to rectify the error. Shri Ramakrishnappa, ld. SDR fairly concedes to the appellants' view. 3. We have gone through the records of the case caref .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X