Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2003 (6) TMI 171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No. 54/Mum/1997. 3. In this appeal, filed by the Revenue, solitary grievance raised is as follows: "On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) has erred in directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 6,51,22,058 made on account of interest on Government securities and IRFC bonds." 4. Learned counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to Tribunal's order dt. 22nd Nov., 2002 passed in assessee's own case for the asst. yr. 1992-93, on a perusal of which we find that the aforesaid order squarely covers the above issue in favour of the assessee. Learned counsel has also invited our attention to the orders passed by the Co-ordinate Benches, i.e., in the case of Mashreq Bank vs. Dy. CIT (ITA No. 3/M .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... A transaction in CP purchase does not create the same relationship between the purchaser and the issuer as in the case of a loan transaction between the lender and the borrower. As such, such transaction constitutes investment and not 'loans and advances'. In substance, thus, assessee's grievance is that the CIT(A) erred in holding that the income of Rs. 1,07,11,877 on commercial paper is exigible to interest tax. 11. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee claimed that its income earned by way of discount on commercial paper is not exigible to interest tax as transaction of commercial paper does not create the same relationship between the purchaser and the issuer, as in the case of loan transactions between a lender .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ross-objection before us. 13. Shri Sonde, learned advocate, appeared for the assessee, and Shri Bains, learned Departmental Representative, appeared for the Revenue. Learned Representatives have been heard, material before us perused and the factual matrix of the case as also the applicable legal position deliberated upon. 14. We find that s. 2(7) of the Interest-tax Act, 1974 defines interest as "interest on loans and advances made in India and includes (a) commitment charges on unutilised portion of any credit sanctioned for being availed of India; and (b) discount on promissory notes and bills of exchange drawn or made in India, but does not include (i) interest referred to in sub-s. (1B) of s. 42 of the Reserve Bank of Indi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the position, as evident from the statutory provision, from Finance Minister's speech and RBI circular to the scheduled banks, that the incidence of interest-tax was not to be borne by the bank but was to be passed on to the borrowers which was not possible in case the same is held to be applicable to the securities such as debentures and like. In the case of Punjab National Bank vs. Dy. CIT, the Tribunal after having taken note of the provision of sub-s. (28B) of s. 2 which defines interest on securities including inter alia 'interest on debentures or other securities for money issued by' amongst others 'a company', concluded that since interest on debentures is nothing but interest on securities which is different from loans and advan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ind of financial instrument to the investors which is issued in the form of 'usance promissory note transferable by endorsement and delivery'. The thrust of the arrangement is in the nature of issuance of a security and not of raising a loan. It is well settled that unless the arrangement is in the nature of a loan or advance, mere fact that a security is issued in the form of a promissory note or bill of exchange will not ipso facto bring the interest thereon in the ambit of s. 2(7) of the Act. If that was a reason enough for coverage by s. 2(7), the interest on debentures, which are also admittedly in the nature of a usance promissory note, could not have been treated as not exigible to interest tax. In fact, commercial paper is more akin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates