Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2001 (8) TMI 273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... essee-company has paid Rs. 1,20,50,000 to Janapriya Hospitals Corporation Ltd. (now known as Duncan Goenka Hospitals Ltd.) towards contribution to their equity shares capital as co-promoters with its holding company Duncans Industries Ltd. During the year under consideration the allotment of aforesaid shares had not been made and accordingly the assessee-company had shown this amount under the head "Advances against Investments". The break-up of the funds utilized for this advance of Rs. 1,20,50,000 was as under: 1. Out of loan from the Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. Rs. 45,00,000 2. Out of sale proceeds of shares and interest receipts Rs. 75,00,000 --------------- Rs. 1,20,50,000 3. The assessee-company had paid inte .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d on this point which was confirmed in appeal by the CIT(A). On the facts and in the circumstances, interest payment of Rs, 7,20,000 to PGFI is disallowed and added to the total income." 4. Aggrieved by the above order, the assessee-company approached to the CIT(A). The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance of interest payment and further fortified the Dy. CIT's action by observing that the interest-free advance given to sister concern was not for business purposes, therefore, interest payment, proportionate to the said advance was not an expenditure of a business nature. The CIT(A) also relied on his order for the earlier year in which it was held that the advance had not been materialised into allotment of shares of M/s Janapriya Hospital Co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... est. Reliance was placed on the order in ITA No. 2676/Cal/1995. 7. On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative strongly relied on the orders of the lower authorities and argued that object of the assessee-company was not to make interest-free advance by taking loan on interest, and that no income was generated out of the aforesaid investment in shares. Therefore, it was contended that no deduction under s. 36(1)(iii) in respect of proportionate advance out of interest-bearing loans is admissible. 8. We have heard erudite arguments of both the learned representatives, gone through the orders of the authorities below, carefully perused the paper book filed by the learned authorised representative. On going through the facts o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in the course of the business, the fact that no income had been generated out of the same during the relevant previous year, should not result in disallowance of interest attributable to the capital borrowed for the purpose of making the alleged investment. In the course of the business the assessee may be required to park and earmark the funds in investment as a matter of prudent business decision. In the instant case it was essentially a business decision to invest in the shares of Janapriya Hospital Corporation Ltd., in accordance with the main object clause of assessee-company. As per the memorandum and articles of association, such an activity will have to be considered to form a regular business activities of the assessee-company. It .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er s. 36(1)(iii), provided the funds had been used for the purpose of the business in its regular course. Interest paid on borrowed capital is an allowable deduction under s. 36(1)(iii), provided it has been used for the purpose of the business, irrespective of the fact that it has been diverted from one business purpose to another. Furthermore, while finally arriving at the taxable/net income of business, all the inputs, i.e., the expenses including interest paid on capital borrowed for purpose of the business, are to be taken into consideration. While doing so it is to be seen whether the assessee borrowed capital for purpose of the business and used it for the same. If so, then interest thereon has to be allowed as a deduction under s. 3 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates