Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2013 Year 2013 This

Valuation dispute – Related person - Mutual Interest in the ...

Central Excise

May 14, 2013

Valuation dispute – Related person - Mutual Interest in the business of each other - Interconnected undertaking - considering various aspects, decided in favor of assessee - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Valuation - related party transaction - The transaction of ₹ 5 lakhs as loan on payment of interest cannot be the reason for holding partnership and private...

  2. Valuation of goods - Related person - transaction value is influenced being related person - the adjudicating authority has rightly loaded the value 10% on the...

  3. Valuation - Interpretation of Statute - definition of related person under section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944, read with definition of "interconnected undertakings"...

  4. Nature of Income – Mutual funds sold - business income or capital gains - units of mutual funds are not freely transferable nor tradable and thus cannot be categorized...

  5. Valuation of imported goods - Related person - Merely because there were transfer of funds in India amongst three importers will not make them related persons in terms...

  6. Valuation – joint venture – related parties - merely by holding 40% equity by the foreign company, Indian company cannot become a related person to the foreign company - AT

  7. Valuation (Central Excise) - Sale to related parties - the price to the related person cannot be called a non-commercial price since the same was higher than the price...

  8. Valuation - Rule 9/10(a) are not applicable to interconnected undertakings being related persons, therefore, the proceedings initiated against the appellants are not...

  9. Valuation - merely because buyers are interconnected undertakings it is not sufficient to hold that the companies are related persons. - AT

  10. Valuation - best judgment assessment - related person - where arm's length sales are made at well below cost, CESTAT is not justified in adopting cost plus method - SC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates