Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - petitioner has not ...

Income Tax

June 11, 2013

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - petitioner has not waived his appellate right - delay of 2 years, 10 months and 8 days can not be condoned - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - petitioner has not ...

Income Tax

June 11, 2013

You may also like:

Reasonable cause for the delay in filing the revision application before the CIT under Section 264 - HC

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - It is manifest that only suo-motu power of the Commissioner under Section 264 of the IT Act, is restricted against an order...

Applications u/s 264 for revision in favor of assessee - Condonation of delay - Proviso to Sub-Section (3) of Section 264 confers a statutory power on the Commissioner...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - condonation of delay in filing an application - in terms of the proviso to Section 264 (3), the PCIT should also examine whether...

Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

Condonation of delay - revision u/s 264 - as the order u/s 143(1) came to be passed within this one year itself, writ petitioner had taken the first step to have income...

Condoantion of delay in filing an application for Revision u/s 264 - there is a clear provision for condoning the delay - thus the right of revision could be avoided by...

Condonation of delay of 163 days, 207 days & 197 days in filing appeal by Revenue - A perusal of paragraphs 3 to 8 of the application of condonation of delay would...

Right to file an appeal before CIT(A) where the application for revision u/s 264 rejected by the CIT - Notwithstanding unsuccessful effort of the assessee in the...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - the appeal of the Assessee has not been disposed on merits. In view of this, there was no bar to the CIT in exercising...

Quick Updates: