Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able ...

Income Tax

October 23, 2013

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able to prove that the assessee was guilty of fraud or gross or willful negligence, penalty cannot be sustained - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able ...

Income Tax

October 23, 2013

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - absence of due care does not mean that the assessee is guilty of either furnishing inaccurate particulars or attempting to conceal its income -...

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - on account of survey, if the assessee has offered additional income, it cannot be a ground to impose penalty under section 271(1)(c) unless...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The absence of due care does not mean that the assessee was guilty of furnishing inaccurate particulars to conceal his income - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

Assessee neither challenged reopening nor has been able to disprove the finding of AO - penalty leviable u/s 271(1)(c) as assessee furnished inaccurate particulars and...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Reopening of assessment - bogus claim of depreciation - the assessee is guilty of fraud and has perpetuated fraud todefraud the revenue - no relief can be granted.

Quick Updates: