Validity of order u/s 263 - power of CIT - Once the Assessing ...

Income Tax

December 5, 2013

Validity of order u/s 263 - power of CIT - Once the Assessing Officer has followed a decision of jurisdictional High Court , then there was no jurisdiction to revise such assessment order - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of order u/s 263 - power of CIT - Once the Assessing ...

Income Tax

December 5, 2013

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - belated employee’s contribution to PF and ESIC funds - AO did not follow the CBDT circular but followed the HC decision - The CIT in exercise the...

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - receipt of share premium - the power of revision u/s 263 does not allow for supplanting or substituting the view of the Assessing Officer. The...

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

Revision u/s 263 - Once the valuation report has not been sent by the valuation officer to the assessing officer/assessee, within the period stipulated by the act that...

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order as contrary to the draft assessment order - The remedy against unjust disallowances, on merits, lies in the appellate process and not...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - power to review v/s power to reassess - Only material relied upon by the assessing officer, in this case, is the material supplied by...

Revision u/s 263 - Characterization of income - Real estate business - Assessing Officer has conducted sufficient enquiry as required under Explanation 2(a) to Section...

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

Revision u/s 263 - merger of the order - the entire issue of limited scrutiny, reasons for selection, the Bank accounts in questions were before the ld. Pr. CIT. On this...

Quick Updates: