Retainership fess - no relationship of an employer & employee - ...

Income Tax

December 20, 2013

Retainership fess - no relationship of an employer & employee - The fees received by assessee did not fall under the category of “Salary” but required to be taxed as “Professional Fees” - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Retainership fess - no relationship of an employer & employee - ...

Income Tax

December 20, 2013

You may also like:

Non deduction of TDS on payment for professional fees as towards directors salary - Unless employee employer relationship exists, no TDS u/s 194J before 1.7.2012 - AT

Nature of services - Manpower Supply Agency Service or employer employee relationship to constitute salary - prima facie assessee is liable to pay service tax - AT

TDS on fee paid to doctors – Doctors treated as consultants – there is no employer and employee relationship existing - tax has to be deducted u/s 194J and not u/s 192 - AT

TDS u/s 194C or 192 - existence of employer and employee relationship between the doctors and hospital - fact remains that as per details filed by the assessee,...

Tax paid by the employer on the salary/remuneration of the employee - Section 17(2) - such payment was to be excluded from the income of the employees - AT

TDS u/s 192 OR 194J - payment to Hospital Based Consultants (HBCs) / Doctors - Employee employer relationship exists or not - TDS was rightly deducted u/s 194J.

Whether payment made to employees in india falls under the category of ‘Fees for technical services’ – seconded agreement - Indo-UK Treaty - The 'make available'...

Man Power Recruitment and Supply Agency Service - reverse charge mechanism (RCM) - the appellants have issued Form-16 series to the said employees as their employer and...

Non-payment of professional fee/retainership fee bills of empanelled lawyers - The fact that the Petitioner was forced to approach this Court is extremely unfortunate....

Taxable service or not - providing commission on profit to one of the directors - existence of employer/employee relationship or not - The Tribunal held that the...

Quick Updates: