Validity of para 2.3 of FTP and Para 8.3.6 of the HOP - Power of ...

Central Excise

February 26, 2014

Validity of para 2.3 of FTP and Para 8.3.6 of the HOP - Power of DGFT - Power to frame Duty Draw Back Rules - powers conferred under Section 19 cannot be re-delegated to the DGFT as expressly prohibited under Section 6(3) of the Act - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of para 2.3 of FTP and Para 8.3.6 of the HOP - Power of ...

Central Excise

February 26, 2014

You may also like:

Scope and validity of policy circular - EPCG Authorisation - The impugned policy circular dated 29.03.2019 is therefore, beyond the jurisdiction of respondent no. 3 as...

Duty draw back - The appellant made an application for draw back under Rule 6 - the department’s out-right rejection without verification is unacceptable. - AT

Scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) - issuance of the statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Change in address - The assessee submitted that he changed his address and the new address...

CENVAT credit - common services used for taxable as well as exempted service - The option was available to the assessee to reverse the proportionate credit under Rule...

Availment of CENVAT Credit - Non maintenance of separate account - When it is impossible to comply with the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 6, it would not be...

Demand of Service tax at the rate of 6%/8% of the value of exempted goods - As per Sub-Rule (3A) of Rule 6(3), the Cenvat Credit required to be reversed is as per the...

Validity of summons issued u/s 70 - Proper officer - The High court examined Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and determined that its scope differed from that of Section...

Assessment of turnover of the applicant as per Section 4(3) of the VAT - levy of tax on turnover of sale has to be done in the manner provided in Section 4(3) of the Act...

Refund of ITC or claim of duty draw back - the petitioner, for the month of July, 2017 has opted to stick with the claim of duty draw back seeing as the amount of...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Proceedings initiated u/s 6(3) of the FEMA - The provision has been omitted - saving clause - When the proceedings were initiated against the Petitioners, Section 6(3)...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - There is no requirement under Rule 6(3)(i) and Rule 6(3A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules that the option had to be exercised on the first day of...

Scope of exemption notification - Absolute exemption or conditional exemption - In the present case, the goods were supplied under notification No. 108/1995-CE depending...

Refund of Terminal Excise Duty - deemed exports - in addition to ab initio exemption, the EOU is additionally eligible to receive entitlements of DTA supplier as...

CENVAT Credit - Separate Accounts - Prima facie it was impossible for the Appellants to maintain separate account and inventory of Zinc Skimming used for manufacture of...

Quick Updates: