Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal ...

Income Tax

September 16, 2014

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal by the High Court is sufficient to debar the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal ...

Income Tax

September 16, 2014

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c ) - the assessee's non-appealing of the issue does not tantamount to admission of addition - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has accepted the additions made in the assessment does not by itself justify the imposition of penalty for concealment - AT

Whether levy of penalty u/S 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is automatic – Imposition of penalty is not automatic. - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO had come to the conclusion that for want of suppling sufficient material by the assessee, the claim of commission cannot be accepted - No penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the addition was set aside, there was no question of imposition of penalty - HC

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Quick Updates: