Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2015 Year 2015 This

Deletion of addition u/s 68 - We fail to understand that whether ...

Income Tax

April 23, 2015

Deletion of addition u/s 68 - We fail to understand that whether small raw hide suppliers can afford to provide this long credit and hence, this claim cannot be accepted in the absence of confirmation from supplier and their addresses - Additions confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reassessment - 'raw hides and skins' and 'dressed hides and skins' both are different commodities. - HC

  2. Specified Companies (Furnishing of information about payment to micro and small enterprise suppliers) Order, 2019

  3. Addition u/s 68 - It cannot be held that suppliers were not genuine only because summons u/s 133(6) were not served. - AT

  4. Protective addition made in the hands of the assessee - addition u/s 68 - the Revenue cannot take different stand in respect of these two assessee.

  5. Addition of income being gift of India Millennium Deposit received as unexplained credit u/s 68 - genuinity stands proved - no addition - AT

  6. Addition u/s 68 on account of unsecured loans from directors - Assessee has failed to show creditworthiness of both the lenders. - additions confirmed.

  7. Addition u/s 68 – Genuineness of transaction in shares - genuine or sham and bogus – Revenue in failing to discharge the basic onus - inquiry was not carried forward -...

  8. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit - Onus to prove - it is not the case that the AO was not afforded the opportunities for his comments on the additional...

  9. Deletion of LTCG as non-genuine - transactions in shares - Deletion of undisclosed commission paid for arranging accommodation entries - assessee proves that...

  10. Deletion made u/s 68 of the Act – he assessee company could not be forced to adduce more evidence which was beyond the control of the assessee company - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates