Denial of consequential refund - entire demand arose out of ...

Central Excise

September 1, 2015

Denial of consequential refund - entire demand arose out of differential duty worked out in each invoice. The goods were already cleared - question of unjust enrichment does not arise. - appellants are eligible for refund amount debited in RG.23C-Part-II as re-credit of cenvat credit - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of consequential refund - entire demand arose out of ...

Central Excise

September 1, 2015

You may also like:

Refund claim - Adjustment of differential duty in refund sanctioned - adjudicating authority rightly adjusted the refund claim against the demand of differential duty - AT

Demand of differential duty - Revenue adjusted rebate (refund) from Unit II towards interest due from Unit I - the rebate cannot be adjusted towards the interest due of...

100% EOU - Demand of Differential Cost Recovery Charges paid - Claim of refund of excess MOT charges paid - the finding of the Commissioner is factually wrong - Demand...

Levy of redemption fine and penalty - provisional release of goods - the appellant paid entire amount of the differential duty along with interest thereon and 15% duty...

Demand of differential duty and interest - demand towards cash discounts availed for which prompt payments are not made by the customers within the specified period -...

Demand for interest on delayed payment of duty - appellant is liable to pay the interest on the differential duty paid through supplementary invoices.

Captive consumption - excise duty upon molasses - Suppression of value of goods - Demand of differential duty - The burden is upon the proper officer. - HC

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Demand of interest on differential duty - the claim of the appellant that since the assessment was provisional, therefore, interest is not applicable, is not correct,...

Demand of differential Duty - Revenue has only wasted its energy when there is no revenue loss and therefore, unjustifiably extended the larger period of limitation, for nothing.

Quick Updates: