Denial of CENVAT Credit - Motor vehicles - The JO trucks are not ...

Central Excise

October 14, 2015

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Motor vehicles - The JO trucks are not considered as motor vehicle as per the Section 2 (28) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, since the same are used only in a factory or in any other enclosed premises. - credit allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Motor vehicles - The JO trucks are not ...

Central Excise

October 14, 2015

You may also like:

CENVAT credit - input services - Rule 2(l) of CCR 2004 - insurance taken in the name of Joint Managing Director - Insurance premiums of motor vehicles and repair of...

Denial of CENVAT credit - though the appellant has availed CENVAT credit belatedly which is well within the provisions of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - credit allowed - AT

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Whether certain pollution control services availed by the appellant are eligible to CENVAT Credit under CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 - Held Yes,...

CENVAT Credit - since the Motor Vehicle was held to be a capital goods, the eligibility of Cenvat credit on Rent-a-Cab service shall not be hit by the exclusion clause...

Cenvat Credit - Outdoor catering - input services - Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules(CCR), 2004 – statutory obligation under the Factories Act

CENVAT credit - renting of motor vehicle - input services - the interpretation of the lower authorities that motor vehicle are not capital goods for the services...

Denial of CENVAT Credit - invoices did not contain the registration number of the service provider which is a mandatory requirement - Rule 9(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules -...

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Manual numbering of invoices and not by franking machine - in view of the provisions of Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, credit allowed - AT

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

Denial of CENVAT credit to the appellant on such general services (motor vehicle) on the ground that the same is covered in the exclusion clause is erroneous - credit allowed.

Quick Updates: