Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2015 Year 2015 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)( c) - we are unable to see any malafide or ...

Income Tax

October 16, 2015

Penalty u/s 271(1)( c) - we are unable to see any malafide or any deliberate act on the part of the assessee and without any hesitation, we hold that the assessee cannot be held guilty of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of its income, specially when the assessee filed a revised return immediately after noticing the mistake - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - it was admitted by the Department that the information came from the assessee without any suggestion or detection from the Department - no penalty - AT

  3. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance u/s 40 (a)(ia) only for lack of payment of TDS while the payment was bonafide - Though the failure on the part of the...

  4. Failure on the part of the assessee to file the returns voluntarily, as statutorily prescribed, would be a culpable act or omission attracting penalty under Section 271(1)(c).

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non disclosure of capital gain on sale of land in the income tax return - Sale consideration by applying the provisions of section 50C (i.e...

  6. Imposition of penalty - Penalty cannot be imposed if there is no malafide on part of importer, no tests have been carried out and no expert opinion has been obtained - AT

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) - assessee was given very little time to furnish long list of requirements and there was reasonable cause...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

  9. The fact is that as a dealer, the appellants indulged in such a deliberate and blatant act to issue invoices without the related goods - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus share capital transactions - The explanation offered towards bonafide issue of share capital cannot be outrightly rejected when tested on...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates