Revision u/s 263 - While allowing benefit of section 11 of the ...

Income Tax

October 23, 2015

Revision u/s 263 - While allowing benefit of section 11 of the Act, the Assessing Officer is also required to examine whether the conditions prescribed under section 13 of the Act is fulfilled or not. But the Assessing Officer did not do this exercise and has computed the refund claimed by the assessee - order of AO is erroneous - revision upheld - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - While allowing benefit of section 11 of the ...

Income Tax

October 23, 2015

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - the transaction has never been examined by the assessing officer. No enquiry has been conducted relating to the alleged sum....

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - receipt of share premium - the power of revision u/s 263 does not allow for supplanting or substituting the view of the Assessing Officer. The...

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order passed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) - no any incriminating material unearthed by search team therefore Assessing Officer’s order is not erroneous.

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - unaccounted interest payments - the Commissioner of Income Tax cannot find fault and he cannot impose his view on the Assessing Officer - AT

Revision u/s 263 - entire materials on record were not considered by the Assessing Officer - It would have definitely be an erroneous procedure adopted by the AO - HC

Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

Quick Updates: