Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2015 Year 2015 This

Imposition of penalty for abetment against the Chartered ...

Central Excise

December 18, 2015

Imposition of penalty for abetment against the Chartered Accountant for giving wrong certificate - This action could not be described as an act to attract penalty under Rule 26 and 27 - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalty - Misdeclaration of goods - Abetment in pilferage – whatever leniency he deserves, is already meted out to him at the hands of Tribunal -...

  2. Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act - Penalty on CEO for abetment - Meaning of word abetment is "to help someone in wrong doing" - In the instant case such...

  3. Imposition of penalty u/s 271A(2)(c) – delay in furnishing return for Tax Collection at Source (TCS) - The liability cannot be shifted on the Chartered Accountant or...

  4. Levy of penalty - demand against wrongly claimed ITC - The benefit of this ITC was never granted by the revenue. Hence, it was not a case, where wrong information was...

  5. Export of the goods - claim of duty drawback - Mere allegation of wrong classification without proving intentional mala fide cannot lead to imposition of penalty - CGOVT

  6. Refund claim - SAD - importer appointed a new Chartered Accountant, who becomes their regular Chartered Accountant and cannot be considered as a onetime independent...

  7. Levy of penalty for abetment - penalty cannot be imposed merely on the basis of assumption and presumption and without any basis - HC

  8. Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act - abetment in smuggling - It is settled law that for imposition of penalty, it is necessary to establish a positive role on...

  9. Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - willful attempt - assessee has given the explanation in respect of source of jewellery - no case of imposition of penalty - AT

  10. Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates