Denial of SSI Exemption - benefit of Notification No.9/2001 - ...

Central Excise

January 5, 2016

Denial of SSI Exemption - benefit of Notification No.9/2001 - goods falling under Chapter 93 were excluded from the scope of SSI benefit during the relevant period - SSI Notification No.8/2001 was amende w.e.f 1st October 2001. By the said amendment, parts falling under Heading 93.06 or 93.07 were again made eligible for the benefit of the SSI exemption - said amendment is not retrospective - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of SSI Exemption - benefit of Notification No.9/2001 - ...

Central Excise

January 5, 2016

You may also like:

Small scale (SSI) exemption - initial clearances at full rate of duty will not result in denial of SSI Exemption benefit for the entire period - AT

Denial of Benefit of SSI Notification No.1/93 – Brand name not belonging to appellant – use of brand name for different goods is permissible under the law - AT

SSI Exemption - use of Brand/Trade mark or others - as long as assignment stands the assessee using the brand name is eligible for the benefit of SSI exemption notification - AT

Export of goods procured against CT-1 certificate after processing and not in the same condition - benefit of Notification No. 42/2001 CE(NT) dated 26.06.2001 allowed - AT

SSI exemption - appellant herein cannot be denied the benefit of SSI notification on the ground that the brand Que is not registered in their name - AT

SSI exemption - manufacture of medicines - Respondent were clearing the goods under the brand name other person as such, they were not entitled to benefit of SSI...

Denial of rebate claim - Area based exemption - goods were manufactured by a manufacturer who has availed benefit of Notification No.39/01-CE(NT) - benefit of rebate...

Denial of duty exemption under Notification 21/2002-Cus – As the goods imported was secondary or defective – benefit of doubt extended to assessee - exemption granted - AT

SSI Exemption - whether after assignment agreement in respect of brand name, it can be inferred that the respondent is using the brand name of another person and...

Procedural infraction in export of goods - failure to incorporate self-certification on ARE-2 as prescribed in Notification No. 42/2001 - benefit of export allowed - CGOVT

Quick Updates: