Levy of penalty on employee of CHA - The appellant was aware of ...

Customs

January 28, 2016

Levy of penalty on employee of CHA - The appellant was aware of the mis-declaration of the value and the description of the goods of the consignments in question in this appeal as well as for the earlier consignments. Hence retraction of the statement would not improve the case of the appellant before this Tribunal - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty on employee of CHA - The appellant was aware of ...

Customs

January 28, 2016

You may also like:

Import of consignment of consumer goods and household items from UAE - Mis declaration of goods - appellant is only an employee of the CHA firm - penalty reduced taking...

Penalty under Customs Act cannot be imposed on CHA and its directors in case of misdeclaration of value and description if no role is found in such contravention - AT

Levy of penalty on shipping line u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - mis-declaration of goods in description as well as in quantity in bills of landing - As the fact has...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Mis-declaration of description of goods – export of non-basmati rice as basmati rice - no leniency can be made to reduce redemption fine - AT

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Fraudulent claims of duty drawbacks - Mis declaration of goods -charges levelled in the show cause notice stood established against the appellants - levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Imposition of penalties on CHA - mis-declaration of vessel - the inclusion of ‘supply vessel’ in the description is equally ambiguous in deciding upon the classification....

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Imposition of penalty on Director of the company - mis-declaration of goods - It is anybody’s guess that the CHA will not be benefited in any manner by this...

Quick Updates: