Settlement Commission has erred in rejecting the petitioner’s ...

Service Tax

July 9, 2016

Settlement Commission has erred in rejecting the petitioner’s application for settlement dated 25.11.2013, by its order dated 14.11.2014, on the ground that the said application was barred by Section 32-(O)(1)(i) of the Act. - The Explanation to Section 32-O(1)(i) does not have retrospective effect - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Settlement Commission has erred in rejecting the petitioner’s ...

Service Tax

July 9, 2016

You may also like:

Power of AO to pass an assessment order where application was filed before settlement commission – Income Tax Settlement Commission, rejected the application - decided...

Withdrawal of CIRP Application filed u/s 12 A of IBC - settlement between the Appellants and the Corporate Debtor - On the day when the Application was filed, there was...

Applications for settlement u/s 245D rejected - since there was no true and full disclosure, there is no scope for any interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Service Tax Dispute - Settlement Commission rejected the application - We specifically reject and repeal the reason given by the Settlement Commission that it cannot...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Settlement of case - before submitting reply to the show cause notice, approached the Settlement Commission - The dismissal of the application filed before the...

The petitioner having opted for settlement is not permitted to dissect Settlement Commission's Order to accept what is favourable and reject what is not.

Ordinarily the settlement comes as a package and composite tax statement is either to be accepted or rejected - Settlement tax cannot be accepted only in part - HC

Denial of exemption u/s 10(25)(ii) - filling of return in the abbreviated name - We are of the considered view that ld. CIT (A) has erred in dismissing the rectification...

Application for settlement of cases - High Court has observed that, the assessment order for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2019-20 could not have been passed as the application filed...

Quick Updates: