Tax perquisites - tax borne by employer is paid directly to the ...

Income Tax

August 10, 2016

Tax perquisites - tax borne by employer is paid directly to the tax authority and there is no payment to the tax employee, the tax so borne is a non-monetary transaction and the same is exempted u/s 10(10CC) - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tax perquisites - tax borne by employer is paid directly to the ...

Income Tax

August 10, 2016

You may also like:

Tax borne and paid by the employer has to be excluded while computing the perquisite of "rent free accommodation" - HC

Determination of perquisite value - Notional interest on deposit given by the employer with the landlord for securing the rented premises - Not a perquisite - not taxable - AT

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - salary income - denying the HRA Exemption claimed u/s 10(13) - taxing the perquisites value twice - Without rejecting the Form No. 16...

Whether “Tax Payments“ by employer on behalf of Employee be considered as a taxable Perquisite further liable to tax - Taxes paid by the employer on behalf of the...

Income u/s 2(24) - Whether the tax paid by the employer is a “perquisite” within the meaning of Section 17(2) and, therefore, in terms of Rule 3 of the Income Tax Rules,...

Levy of service tax on perquisite paid to MD - Form 31 and 25C filed under company’s act show the and salary and perquisites payable or paid to MD - there is force in...

Salary income - Perquisites - Addition u/s. 17(2)(v) towards insurance premium paid by the employer - any policy to effect an assurance on the life of the assessee shall...

Claim of relief u/s 89 - receipt of arrears in lieu of employer's contribution to the newly implemented 'Defined Contribution Scheme' - Section 17(2)(vii) of the Act...

Business perquisite - the perquisites of business are taxable under clause (iv) of Section 28 of the Act, which contemplates that the value of any benefit or perquisite - HC

Refund of service tax paid on GTA services - service tax was paid directly by the provider of services whereas it was the liability of the recipient under reverse charge...

Quick Updates: