Imposition of penalties - mis-match of value - as the appellant ...

Service Tax

January 3, 2017

Imposition of penalties - mis-match of value - as the appellant having accepted the liability and also having not defended the show cause notice, even after getting opportunity, the beneficial provision of Section 80 need not be invoked. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalties - mis-match of value - as the appellant ...

Service Tax

January 3, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty under section 271C - Only because the assessee before the Tribunal had accepted her liability for deduction of tax at source, cannot be the sole basis for...

Refund of IGST on Export– Invoice mis-match cases –Alternative Mechanism with Officer Interface

Refund of IGST on Export– Invoice mis-match Cases –Alternative Mechanism with Officer Interface

Refund of IGST on Export– Invoice mis-match Cases – Alternative Mechanism with Officer Interface

Imposition of penalty - Mis-declaration of imported goods - Smuggling - penalty cannot be imposed both on the proprietor as well as the firm.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has accepted the additions made in the assessment does not by itself justify the imposition of penalty for concealment - AT

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 53 (12) - movement of goods in the disguise of movement in the course of export to avoid tax liability - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Utilizing CENVAT Credit in discharging service tax liability of GTA service (outward freight) - imposition of penalty under Section 76 - penalty waived u/s 80 - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271A(2)(c) – delay in furnishing return for Tax Collection at Source (TCS) - The liability cannot be shifted on the Chartered Accountant or...

Quick Updates: