Refund claim - the appellant in the capacity of recipient of ...

Service Tax

January 10, 2017

Refund claim - the appellant in the capacity of recipient of service, can file refund application before the authorities having jurisdiction over the service recipient or before the jurisdictional authorities of the service provider u/s 11B - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - the appellant in the capacity of recipient of ...

Service Tax

January 10, 2017

You may also like:

Refund claim by the recipient of services - in absence of dispute regarding the classification of service by the service provider who has discharged the service tax...

Rejection of refund claim - CENVAT Credit - export of services under Business Auxiliary Services in respect of the goods located in India - since recipient of services...

Refund claim made by the recipient of services - service tax was paid wrongly by the service provider - refund allowed - AT

4% SAD refund claim – CBEC allows filing of refund claim at each Customs stations where imports are made instead of single application per Commissionerate.

Refund of accumulated input tax credit - relevant date for the purpose of considering the limitation u/s 54 - The High Court addressed this issue by directing the...

Denial of rebate claim - receipt of commission on transaction - service was received by the recipient abroad and it is partly performed in India and partly performed...

Refund claim - claim was filled before wrong jurisdictional office - before rejecting the application, file should have been transferred to correct jurisdiction by the...

Refund of the service tax paid - Period of limitation - They have filed the refund claim well in time with KMDA with whom they paid the service tax. As the Notification...

Eligibility to file a refund application in FORM GST RFD-01 for a period and category under which a NIL refund application has already been filed

Refund of service tax paid on GTA services - service tax was paid directly by the provider of services whereas it was the liability of the recipient under reverse charge...

Quick Updates: