Refund claim - unjust enrichment - once an assessment is ...

Customs

February 27, 2017

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - once an assessment is provisional, it is provisional for all purposes and not necessarily provisional in respect of the particular ground - however, the CVD component of the excess duty is to be deducted from the total refund claim since the same has already been availed as CENVAT credit by the appellant in their manufacturing process - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - once an assessment is ...

Customs

February 27, 2017

You may also like:

Refund claim - finalization of provisional assessment - unjust enrichment - captive consumption - even in respect of captive consumption, unjust enrichment provision is...

Denial of refund claim - Finalization of provisional assessment - prior to the amendment i.e. 13-7-2006, this doctrine of unjust enrichment was not attracted to refund...

Refund claim - Provisional assessment - Unjust enrichment - claim of refund was not subjected to the condition which was brought in by way of amendment for the first...

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment clause shall not apply for finalization of the provisional assessment for the cases prior to 13.7.2006 - AT

Finalization of provisional assessment - principles of unjust enrichment are not applicable to this refund claim. - AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Quick Updates: