Job-work - benefit of N/N. 214/96 and N/N. 84/95-CE cannot be ...

Central Excise

March 14, 2017

Job-work - benefit of N/N. 214/96 and N/N. 84/95-CE cannot be extended to the appellant as the requisite undertakings have not been given by the appellant - These undertakings are not merely procedural undertaking but substantive undertaking in so far as by virtue of this undertaking, the principal manufacturer takes the responsibility of duty liability in case it arose - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Job-work - benefit of N/N. 214/96 and N/N. 84/95-CE cannot be ...

Central Excise

March 14, 2017

You may also like:

Cenvat credit - job work - input services used in the manufacture of job worked goods exempted under Notification No.214/86-CE is admissible. - AT

Valuation of Niacin - Captive consumption - job work - Notification No. 10/96-CE - Such exemption being granted at public cost that cannot be liberally construed to...

Captive Consumption - Benefit of exemption - Since the appellant has got their goods manufactured/yarn dyed from job worker; in these circumstances, the job worker is...

CENVAT Credit - inputs were sent to job worker under Rule 4(5)(a) of CCR,2004 without reversing the Cenvat credit - job worker instead of following the N/N. 214/86-CE,...

Job work - Reversal of CENVAT Credit - Even though the goods manufactured under Notification 214/86- CE, the CENVAT Credit in respect of inputs used in the said goods is...

Benefit of Notification No.108/95 C.E. - projected funded by the UN - Machines were utilized by the job worker in respect of the project - exemption allowed - HC

Cenvat Credit - Denial of input service credit in the hands of Job worker who is availing the benefit of exemption notification no. 8/2005 ST and 214/86 CE and did not...

Job work - supplier have not given an undertaking to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the factory of the job worker as required in...

Disallowance of CENVAT Credit - Job works - Whether the job workers can prefer to pay excise duty in spite of having exemption notification bearing no. 214 of 1986 - held yes - AT

CENVAT credit - when the job worker has factually paid the duty and when as per the N/N. 214/86, the appellant supplier, who sends the goods for job work is responsible...

SC confirmed the decision of tribunal against the assessee denying the benefit of exemption from duty on Job work - Benefit under N/N. 214/86 - As the principal...

Job work - Principal was not having a manufacturing facility, power connection etc. - Notification No.214/86-CE dated 25.3.1986. - prima facie job worker is not eligible...

Liability to duty - principal manufacturer or job worker - the principal manufacturer i.e. who furnished the undertaking under notification 83/94 and 84/94 is liable to duty - AT

Exemption under N/N. 67/95-CE - Clearances of acetylene gas for captive consumption - the use of railway tracks are meant for production of goods. The acetylene gas used...

Benefit of N/N. 67/95-CE dt. 16.03.1995 - captive consumption - Department's claim that once invoice is raised to the customer, they were supposed to pay duty even if...

Quick Updates: